Brexit and Leaving the EU. AskUK Rules. Include your question in the title; it will increase the likelihood of getting an answer. Posts with no content will be removed. Include some text in the post such as more information or your experience or opinion. Uncivil comments will be met by bans.
Do not insult other users, do not engage in flaming. Please refrain from posting personally identifiable information about individuals.
No pointless rants; please try and encourage discussion, not just vent your anger. If you have any type of medical issue, please call the on 111, or visit your GP. Reddit is not a good place to seek medical advice. No surveys or questionnaires. Please use for problems with your internet service or computers. Also try I want to ask about. Housing Situation.
or. Getting a UK Visa and/or eligibility. Please visit. UK Political Discussion. Please visit I'm new or coming to the UK. FAQs.
Related Subreddits.
I' applying for a provisional driving licence this week and I'm currently filling out the form I've got to the part 5 (your proof of Identity) (I'm having to send my birth certificate as I don't have any of the other I.D). Below that it says 'Please write the serial(s) of the document(s) you are enclosing. I don't seem to see a serial on it, what do I put down?
It does have an Application number and a QBDY number - what ever they are. Also is the Birth Certificate, origional letter about claims on state benefit and NI card enough for them?
I'm only asking this point as I don't want to have to send it off, wait 3 weeks for it to come back saying there is an error and they have to send it off again for another 3 week wait.
(Original post by purpleone) hi, im filling out my form and its asking for the serial number on my birth certificate, from what I can tell it can be one of two numbers. Theres GM followed by 6 numbers in the top right hand corner and 5 letters followed by a number in the left hand corner, there is nothing to indicate which is the serial number! Can anyone help me out and tell me which one to use? Thank you Just wondering about this myself, as there's my NHS number at the bottom, too! On top of that, the number at the top right (which is the one i've used!) is almost camouflaged, as if it's just part of the paper.
After some debating and digging around, we've used this one. I read somewhere that you need to '2 Letter, 6 Number alphanumeric serial number at the top'. Remember, you need to SMALL sheet, which is your actual Birth Cert, AND your National Insurance card/a pay slip.
( by David B) I need to send my forms but I don't know where my reference number on my birth certificate is? The only large number is the one on the bottom right. Which has 3 letters and 6 numbers.
So is my reference number 3 letters + 6 numbers or just the 6 numbers? There is a fair amount of birth certificate fraud around, and this document was produced to help fight it: An extract from that document reads: 'Serial numbers Each certificate is printed with a unique serial number comprising a one to three letterprefix code and up to six digits.
Serial numbers are applied using a security print process. In this process the ink is pressed into the paper resulting in a distinctive hard edge. When certificate stock is issued to a registration district a record is kept of the serial numbers allocated to each registration officer.' So, yes, do quote the letters as well as the digits.
So this is a claim I recently found in a video on FB that has spread quite a bit lately created by a gentleman named Jordan Maxwell. In the video he attempts to compare Admiralty Law (The practice of using shipping manifests for ships coming into harbor) with the Practice of birth certificates. (The link to the video is here for reference as the source of the claim.) He claims that your birth certificate in the US is a security on the stock exchange in the NY stock market.
Quoting his words in the video directly. 'Did you know for instance that your birth certificate is a security on the New York stock market? All birth certificates in the US will tell you on the bottom 'This is printed on security papers. Do not accept if not on full color security paper.'
Then on the right hand corner you will always have a series of red numbers printed on the birth certificate. Those numbers are a security stock exchange number on the world stock exchange. You can go to any stock office and give them those numbers and you can see what your birth certificate (Your Stock) is worth.
They will check it on the stock exchange and find YOU, your birth certificate is a stock on the stock exchange in America. Because you are worth money to the international bank that bought you in 1930.
They say that all people have two parts to their existence – their body and their legal 'person'. The latter is represented by the individual's birth certificate; some freemen claim that it is entirely limited to the birth certificate. Under this theory, a 'strawman' is created when a birth certificate is issued, and this 'strawman' is the entity who is subject to statutory law.
The physical self is referred to by a slightly different name – for example 'John of the family Smith', as opposed to 'John Smith'. Content from external source i was born after 1960 (New York State) though and have no numbers on my certificate. I do have the embossed seal.which i believe is the 'security paper', but i'm too lazy to look up what 'security paper' actually means as i agree with Mick. But under the google search 'what are the numbers on birth certificates', if you click images, there are tons of BCs with serial numbers shown. Edit: -text edit.oops guess i should have actually read it.not the emboss. My certificate doesnt appear to be on security paper. Photodex proshow gold 7.0.3518 crack. And doesnt say anything about security paper on it.
Where Is The Serial Number On A Savings Bond
Maybe that is just for copies? Click to expand.He's just rambling. Again, he's not making a claim of evidence.
He's claiming that if you do something, then something else will happen. He's not providing any evidence that it actually does happen. It's like he's saying 'if you go to a police station, and wave a flag, they will give you a cake'.
But he provides no evidence to back it up. Sure, you could got to a police station and wave a flag, get no cake, and hence disprove his theory. But why would you? The onus is on the person making the claim to provide evidence. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Birth certificates There are three main beliefs about birth certificates in freeman mythology:. The government uses them to create your strawman and legal person to which all your legal responsibilities, debts and liabilities belong.
As a form of registration, they transfer ownership of an individual to the state. This is what allows the state to seize your children if you don't play by their rules. They are financial instruments or birth-tracking bonds ( a.k.a. Live birth bonds) that are sold by the government and then traded on the sea of international commerce, using you as security (an idea taken from the ). Freemen claim the government secures the value of its fiat currency using its own citizens' birth certificate 'bonds.' It is claimed that the value of an individual's 'bond' may reach into the billions.
It's interesting to see how the alleged value of the Birth Certificate has changed over time. When the conspiracy theory started in the US the value was estimated at $630,000 USD more recent versions of this conspiracy theory put the value of Birth Certificates in the billions. This can supposedly be proven by entering the numbers on one's birth certificate into various stock-tracking sites to show the current value of one's 'bond' on the market. Several popular Youtube videos claim to show evidence that numbers on Birth Certificates are actually CUSIP numbers.
In reality, CUSIP numbers are 9 digit alpha-numerical codes. Birth Certificate numbers for the US are 11 digits long. UK birth certificate serial numbers are 10 digits long. In Canada the number is 12 digits long. Notwithstanding this, freemen believe that one can access the money represented by one's own 'bond' though various pseudolegal methods and by filing forms with government agencies.
There are plenty of conmen, fraudsters and snake-oil salesmen selling methods on how to achieve this to gullible fools. Naturally, none have ever been shown to work. The value of one's birth certificate 'bond' can also supposedly be used to discharge one's debts and financial liabilities through a process known as 'acceptance for value' or 'A4V', without the freeman having to gain direct access to the funds himself. The UK Treasury has stated that the existence of these bonds, as well as various other freeman financial concepts, are myths. Click to expand.Exactly.
The whole thing seems to be based on the rather ludicrous concept that there are perfectly legal ways to unlock vast riches and get out of debt, if you know the secret code. The idea seems to be that the government makes it almost, but not quite impossible to crack, and will willingly hand over the loot to those smart enough to know the special handshake. It doesn't seem to occur to them that the government makes the laws, and if any such loophole existed it would have been closed long ago.
Click to expand.They work until they are tested. But part of the reason they are popular is that they give the illusion of working. Like the 'You don't have to pay taxes' scams. Since the tax system is voluntary unless you get audited, you can put anything down on your tax return as a deduction and pay no taxes - or even get a big refund. So it looks like it works. Then you (probably) get audited a few years later, and go to jail. But here, with 'your birth certificate is worth millions', there's even less of an illusion of working than that.
It's just a magical belief wth no evidence to back it up, that would fall apart if ever tested. Birth certificates There are three main beliefs about birth certificates in freeman mythology:.
The government uses them to create your strawman and legal person to which all your legal responsibilities, debts and liabilities belong. As a form of registration, they transfer ownership of an individual to the state.
Where Is The Serial Number On A British Birth Certificate
This is what allows the state to seize your children if you don't play by their rules. They are financial instruments or birth-tracking bonds ( a.k.a. Live birth bonds) that are sold by the government and then traded on the sea of international commerce, using you as security (an idea taken from the ).
Freemen claim the government secures the value of its fiat currency using its own citizens' birth certificate 'bonds.' It is claimed that the value of an individual's 'bond' may reach into the billions.
It's interesting to see how the alleged value of the Birth Certificate has changed over time. When the conspiracy theory started in the US the value was estimated at $630,000 USD more recent versions of this conspiracy theory put the value of Birth Certificates in the billions.
This can supposedly be proven by entering the numbers on one's birth certificate into various stock-tracking sites to show the current value of one's 'bond' on the market. Several popular Youtube videos claim to show evidence that numbers on Birth Certificates are actually CUSIP numbers. In reality, CUSIP numbers are 9 digit alpha-numerical codes. Birth Certificate numbers for the US are 11 digits long. UK birth certificate serial numbers are 10 digits long. In Canada the number is 12 digits long. Notwithstanding this, freemen believe that one can access the money represented by one's own 'bond' though various pseudolegal methods and by filing forms with government agencies.
There are plenty of conmen, fraudsters and snake-oil salesmen selling methods on how to achieve this to gullible fools. Naturally, none have ever been shown to work.
The value of one's birth certificate 'bond' can also supposedly be used to discharge one's debts and financial liabilities through a process known as 'acceptance for value' or 'A4V', without the freeman having to gain direct access to the funds himself. The UK Treasury has stated that the existence of these bonds, as well as various other freeman financial concepts, are myths. From: MasterStuart 23 August 2015 Dear General Register Office, FAO: 151 Officer Notice For Information Under Freedoms of Information Act 2000 Can you please advise me as to why all the birth certificate numbers on all the birth certificates of my family and some of my friends who checked their birth cert relate to funds and or delayed funds on the world markets? For the purpose of checking we changed the numbers slightly to which no accounts can be found in this way but every time we entered a birth certificate number a record is found. Will you explain this? Are there any contractual or consentual obligations attached to the birth certificate process? What is the financial business being created with these records if any?
Is a legal title created from the birth records process and who owns equitable right to it if so? Yours faithfully, MasterStuart From: Hughes Selwyn 24 August 2015 Dear Master Stuart, Thank you for your email via this website to the General Register Office in relation to birth certificate numbers. We have handled your request as official correspondence rather than under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, but this has made no difference to the response. Each birth certificate contains a unique reference number, comprised of letters and numbers. This is an anti-fraud measure, designed to enable it to be possible if need be to tell where the certificate was issued from, and to which register entry it relates. Since each certificate has a unique number, if more than one certificate is issued for the same entry then they will have different serial numbers.
Birth registration has nothing to do with “funds or delayed funds on the world markets”, and the numbers on birth certificates are in no way related to such matters. They simply relate to birth register entries. I’m not sure what you have in mind by “contractual or consensual obligations”. There is a requirement under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 for all births to be registered, but there is no contract entered when a registration is made.
He battles the kidnappers single-handedly, overpowers them and rescues Aditya. Vaaranam aayiram thiruppavai lyrics in tamil pdf.
Where Is The Serial Number On A Lifeproof Case
Similarly, there is no legal title created from the birth registration, and no financial business is created by registering a birth. I hope this helps to clarify the position.
Best wishes Selwyn Hughes Policy advisor Civil Registration Her Majesty's Passport Office, General Register Office Room 03, Smedley Hydro, Trafalgar Road, Southport PR8 2HH E: 1 Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. References Visible links 1.
I think some of the confusion does lie in business law, but they got it the wrong way round. If a company is made up of Me, mick, and TW CObra, then you have to sue the three of us individuals as we are the company. If I leave and Weedwhacker and Deirdre join the board, you have to go back to companies house and change all the details so someone then has to deal with a different set of directors.
So instead, the COMPANY is given a Business registration which is a legal fiction and is described as 'being like a birth certificate for the company' so you then deal with or sue the COMPANY. And whoever is in charge takes the rap, rather than having to change a lot of paperwork EVERY time the personnel change. So a birth certificate does NOT make a person like a company, a company registration makes it like a person. It is based on a big misunderstanding, whether accidental or a deliberately taken out of context. In addition to capitals, t he use of titles such as Mr and Mrs are claimed to indicate a reference to a person’s strawman.Some woos believe that the strawman is created by the government when a birth certificate is filed. Woos sometimes then try and present their birth certificate when their strawman’s name is called for, such as in court.The strawman belief seems to stem from a misunderstanding of the concept of legal person-hood. In actual legal theory there is a difference between what is known as a 'natural person' (which is a human being, i.e., not a legal fiction) and that of a corporate person (a legal fiction known as, which applies to business, charities, governments and any recognised organisation).
Courts recognise human beings as 'persons', not as a legal fiction joined to a flesh and blood human being but as one and the same (though in the past not everyone was recognised as a person before the law). It's interesting because it's right on the intersection between fantasy and reality. Most 'alternative' beliefs like chemtrails and 9/11 trutherism have very little impact on a person's lives - they are just some odd beliefs.
So there's a buffer between fantasy and reality. Here with 'sovereign citizen' type beliefs the idea that you don't have to pay taxes ( or get a driver's license, or pay debts) is in direct conflict with practical reality. A reckoning is inevitable, and that reckoning for most people (I suspect) will hit them like a cold bucket of realization that they were wrong (at least on the practical level).
Other belief systems, like chemtrails or aliens, have no such reckoning. There's no real consequence to belief in chemtrails other than a building puzzlement that the end of the world is not arriving, and not understanding why your friends and family don't talk to you any more. Perhaps it might be useful (regarding chemtrails) to force some kind of reckoning? I'm thinking specifically about predictions people make. You know Dane Wigington is constantly predicting the imminent collapse of everything. Has he put a date on it? Have there been prior predictions?
Click to expand.This is the entire Freeman/legalese concept summed up, a big misunderstanding. Having dealt with a few recently I can say they are true believers in what they've read and been told is 'the law' (which is what can make them a bit on the dangerous side).
Even if you print off legislation and read it to them, they will swear black and blue that it's not lawful because the government is listed on the stock exchange and therefore is a company that they dont need to obey (?). No lawyer will bother with them, and most refuse legal representation because 'that would grant someone power over them in legal matters'. This is the entire Freeman/legalese concept summed up, a big misunderstanding. Having dealt with a few recently I can say they are true believers in what they've read and been told is 'the law' (which is what can make them a bit on the dangerous side).
Even if you print off legislation and read it to them, they will swear black and blue that it's not lawful because the government is listed on the stock exchange and therefore is a company that they dont need to obey (?). No lawyer will bother with them, and most refuse legal representation because 'that would grant someone power over them in legal matters'. I've seen the same 'Freemen' get arrested time and again due to non appearance in court, warrant after warrant, all because it just doesnt hit them that they've got it wrong. One was remanded for weeks at a time for refusing to give the magistrate his name, as that would be 'giving the court a name by which to enslave me'.it knocks me over just how deeply ingrained their belief is. The term 'legal' does not mean lawful. That's why I call banking legalised robbery. It is 'legal' under Statute Law, but it is still robbery, an unlawful offence.
Common Law is what is lawful; Statue Law is what we call 'legal'. We think that a 'person' is a human being, but under the 'legal' definition of Statue Law a 'person' is a corporation and, to meet the criteria of Maritime Law, the 'person' represents a ship, in effect. That's why when a 'person' goes to court - a maritime court in reality - the 'person' stands in the dock. Look at the maritime language in everyday use, especially in relation to governments and legal terms, like ownership and citizenship. We also have a courtship before agreeing a corporate merger called marriage in which we contract with the government corporation through a marriage certificate. I saw a definition of Admiralty Law which said that it 'covers many commercial activities, although land-based or occurring wholly on land, that are maritime in character'.
What they do is use language that makes everything 'maritime in character'. Content from external source.he had me at 'statue law'. Somewhere lies a lengthy tome related to the governance of artfully formed concrete objects. There's definitely a few more of them getting about now in Aus than there were 5-6 years ago. Not widespread and not quite as militant as in other countries, but slowly growing.
There's a funny YouTube clip somewhere in Queensland of a magistrate ordering a psych assessment on a sovereign citizen after 5 minutes of him trying his legalese and failing. The term 'legal' does not mean lawful. That's why I call banking legalised robbery. It is 'legal' under Statute Law, but it is still robbery, an unlawful offence.
Common Law is what is lawful; Statue Law is what we call 'legal'. We think that a 'person' is a human being, but under the 'legal' definition of Statue Law a 'person' is a corporation and, to meet the criteria of Maritime Law, the 'person' represents a ship, in effect.
That's why when a 'person' goes to court - a maritime court in reality - the 'person' stands in the dock. Look at the maritime language in everyday use, especially in relation to governments and legal terms, like ownership and citizenship. We also have a courtship before agreeing a corporate merger called marriage in which we contract with the government corporation through a marriage certificate. I saw a definition of Admiralty Law which said that it 'covers many commercial activities, although land-based or occurring wholly on land, that are maritime in character'. What they do is use language that makes everything 'maritime in character'. Content from external source.he had me at 'statue law'.
Somewhere lies a lengthy tome related to the governance of artfully formed concrete objects. There's definitely a few more of them getting about now in Aus than there were 5-6 years ago. Not widespread and not quite as militant as in other countries, but slowly growing. There's a funny YouTube clip somewhere in Queensland of a magistrate ordering a psych assessment on a sovereign citizen after 5 minutes of him trying his legalese and failing. The suffix -ship has been studied in some detail, but most of that detail is irrelevant to all but the most hardcore etymologist.
The most important thing, in terms of its origin, is that it is unrelated to the word ship meaning 'a vessel, especially a large seagoing vessel'.ship is a suffix used to form nouns of state or condition, chiefly added to nouns and especially personal nouns. In Old English it was widely used with adjectives and participles, but only two of these survive (hardship and worship, from an adjective meaning 'worthy'). Content from external source and the dock being an enclosed area where the defendant stands, symbolically still caged while on trial apparently stems from the flemish word Docke meaning cage. What also is odd, is how these Freeman ideas spread across countries, even though the rules and laws and customs are different. Flags in a courtroom apparently show a maritime connection, although it's very rare to see a flag in a UK courtroom.
US Freemen seem to also link to the Magna Carta ( A UK document from 1215 that Freemen think can never be repealed even though the original was repealed within months and even replacements have been almost completely superseded by now. They (Freemen) get really exercised with the genuine legal term 'joinder' which I believe simply means to 'join' things together - the legal profession (along with most other professions) have a habit of needlessly complicating things and obviously they totally misunderstand it so in conversations with 'authority' they often refuse to accept a 'joinder' being created between themselves, as a human being - i.e. The physical entity and the administrative representation - i.e. A letter to Mr Stuart so in essence a TAX demand sent to Mr Stuart is invalid because they would argue there is no 'joinder' to themselves and as said a great strategy - until it is actually tested.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |